This is one of the more bizarre stories of 2016.
This was also the year the media began to focus on women as sexual objects, and this is why they chose to do so.
As the world’s most popular television show, The Bachelor, started to attract attention, the media started to focus heavily on the relationship between women and their partners.
It was not just the media that began to pick up on this, but the people involved in it as well.
The internet and social media started an ongoing conversation about women and relationships, and the media was quick to pick it up on the subject.
One of the first people to use the term “sexual object” was The Bachelor’s Ryan Hall.
He wrote: “So what do I do?
I should just be able to be sexually available, available to anyone.
I should be able go on dates and stuff like that.
I think that’s what we should all do, and we should make sure that women are able to have that opportunity, that they’re not objectified.
We should make that a normal thing for them to do.”
While the word “sexually available” has become a very common way to describe a woman in the modern world, this is the first time it was used as an insult to describe an actual woman, which is very different from the “sexual” description of women used by the media.
Ryan Hall continued, “There’s been this huge push by the press and by the feminist movement to say that the woman is not a sexual object because she’s not sexually available.
But she is, because she is a woman.
And the word sexual is just a term that’s thrown around a lot.
And when people use it, it’s a way to degrade a woman or degrade men.”
The media continued to be very selective about what it referred to as the “real woman”, and the focus on the “other” became very obvious.
For example, The New York Times called it “the woman’s vagina”, while The New Yorker called it the “vagina of a man”.
“What the media is doing is just trying to erase the woman’s sexual agency by saying that the other thing you can do with a woman’s body is to use it as a sexual commodity, which makes her object, that’s the only thing that you can use a woman for,” said Traci Blackman, an activist with the National Organization for Women.
“When we start talking about the ‘other’ woman, we start being more exclusionary and more exclusionist.
We’re not saying that a woman who’s had sex is not an object, we’re saying that you don’t have the right to use a female body for whatever you want to use.”
Blackman and other activists say that many men have used the term, “sexualized woman”, to describe women in their relationships.
“It’s really the way they talk about women, to make it seem like you can’t have a relationship with a women, because you’re not a woman,” said Blackman.
“I think there’s a big disconnect there, between what we see in the media, and what we actually think of as a real woman.”
This was not the first instance of the term being used to refer to a woman that was not actually a woman, however.
A man named Jason was arrested in 2017 after allegedly grabbing a woman from behind and trying to rape her in a shopping centre parking lot in Australia.
Jason allegedly used the word sexually to describe the woman, and was sentenced to six years in prison.
He was also charged with threatening to murder his girlfriend and his wife.
According to The Australian newspaper, the case was later dropped after police said it was too difficult to prove that Jason had actually assaulted the woman.
“The woman in that case had said ‘no’ several times to him.
I believe the court took that into account,” said Sandra McNeill, a lawyer for the victim, who also spoke about her experiences with the term.
“There are very clear distinctions that need to be made, between the word ‘woman’ and the word woman who has had sex with a man.
I don’t think that you could just say that you are an object or that you have the rights of being a woman without also acknowledging that you also have the human rights of having a relationship, which we all know means that you’re capable of loving, being compassionate, caring, and having a sense of humour.”
McNeill said that it was important to be clear about what a woman is and what her agency is, and that a man cannot claim to be a “woman” without also respecting her agency.
“What we’ve seen is a shift away from the word object, to a term like ‘sexual object’, which is a term for something that’s not necessarily real, that we don’t see as a woman as much as we see a woman with sex.”
The problem is, it has become increasingly clear that the media does not understand the difference